11 May 2026
From wardrobe data to system change: How COSH! is powering a €2.2M European fashion research project
- EPR
- Reuse
- Reduce
EU Digital Product Passport (DPP) & ESPR Explained | Timeline, Scope, Fashion, Footwear & Upcycled Textiles
Most fashion brands think the Digital Product Passport is a 2028 problem. Technically, they’re right. In practice, the brands that wait until 2028 are the ones who will be scrambling to retrofit their entire supply chain documentation in 12 months. The ones preparing now will barely notice the transition.
Here’s what the EU Digital Product Passport actually requires, and what it doesn’t, yet.
The Digital Product Passport (DPP) is a digital record linked to a physical product, accessible via a QR code, NFC chip, or RFID tag. Think of it as a product’s official biography: where it was made, what it’s made of, how it performed against environmental benchmarks, and what should happen to it at the end of life.
The Digital Product Passport (DPP) was formally introduced under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, published in June 2024 and in force since July 2024 . The goal is to make product information transparent and consistent across the EU market: for consumers, authorities, and business buyers alike.
What it is not is a single, universal obligation that kicks in on one date for all products. That distinction matters enormously.
ESPR is a framework regulation. This means it establishes the legal framework for Digital Product Passports, but the actual obligation applies only once the European Commission adopts a product-specific delegated act, a secondary piece of legislation that defines the data a DPP must contain for a given product category. For textiles, footwear, and accessories, the delegated acts are in the making (written 21 April 2026 > we will update this content as soon as the delegated acts are final).
As of April 2026:
This is not a reason to delay preparation. It is a reason to understand the timeline clearly and act accordingly.
The ESPR Working Plan identifies textiles and apparel as a priority product group. The exact scope will be defined in the delegated act, but current research from the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS, 2024) and the 2025 European Commission Textile Preparatory Study points toward a wide remit, covering clothing, fashion accessories, and home textiles.
Footwear: No delegated act currently exists for shoes. A separate assessment is underway with conclusions expected by the end of 2027. If footwear requirements are introduced, they will follow the textile act, not precede it.
Small accessories (socks, hats, scarves, textile jewellery): Scope depends on how the future textiles delegated act defines product categories. ESPR allows flexibility in data carrier placement, particularly for items where a QR code on the garment is impractical. For small accessories, that flexibility will be decisive. Exact exemptions will only be confirmed once the delegated act is published.
Second-hand and vintage: Products already on the EU market before a delegated act comes into force are not required to comply retroactively. For new products entering circulation after the obligation date, resellers, including online marketplaces and second-hand platforms, must ensure that customers can access the DPP, not only original brands.
One unresolved challenge is worth naming here: clothing labels get cut out. Care labels become illegible after years of washing. A QR code that doesn’t survive a decade of wear, resale, and alteration cannot support a circular economy. The durability and placement of DPP data carriers are standardisation problems the delegated act still needs to solve, and ones that brands producing long-lasting clothing should be raising with their industry associations now.
No binding requirements exist yet. Based on the EPRS (2024) and the 2025 Commission Textile Preparatory Study, the delegated act is expected to require data across six categories:
If your brand already collects this data internally, DPP compliance will be an integration exercise. If you don’t know your tier 2 suppliers, or if your fibre composition data lives in a spreadsheet nobody has updated since 2021, that’s where the real work is.
Most DPP coverage is written for brands with a compliance team, a supplier database, and a sustainability manager. If you’re designing, producing, selling, and writing your own Instagram captions, then this section is for you.
The honest answer is: you don’t need to have everything figured out now. But you do need to start knowing what you make. That means:
That’s it for now. No enterprise software. No consultants. Just documentation you probably already have somewhere, either in your production notes, your order confirmations, or your fabric swatches.
At COSH!, we built our DPP tool specifically for brands like yours. You answer a structured set of questions about each product, and we generate a compliant passport. No supply chain team required.
The DPP may not be mandatory yet, but the infrastructure is already being built, and the brands leading on supply chain transparency are finding commercial advantages in the process.
Nobody’s Child is a mid-sized British womenswear brand that began piloting Digital Product Passports in 2023, well ahead of any legal obligation. Early pilots revealed that full DPP compliance requires approximately 110 data points per product and that gathering this information is especially challenging in traditionally opaque fashion supply chains. Since then, the brand has introduced DPPs to 112 styles and generated over 20,000 customer QR scans. Their lesson: you don’t wait for the delegated act to start collecting the data. You start now, and the regulation catches up with your system, not the other way around.
COSH! is building that starting point for independent brands. Our DPP tool lets small labels document their collections, materials, origins, and supply chain data in a format that’s already aligned with anticipated ESPR requirements. Aarden, BYBROWN, Fifth Origins, Udiri, Mon Col Anvers, Bamboo Belgium, and Charkha & Loom are already using it. They’re not waiting for 2028. They’re building the data foundation now, while there’s still time to do it without deadline pressure.
If you want to join them, contact your COSH! community manager to get started.
The DPP felt overwhelming at first; there's a lot to take in. But COSH! guided me through the whole process. I didn't have to go looking for information on my own; it was all there. I've taken the first step, the infrastructure is in place, and I know it's going to be fine. Eva Juchtmans, owner, Mon Col Anvers
Before the DPP arrives, one ESPR measure is already in force.
The ban on the destruction of unsold textiles, apparel, and footwear is written directly into the Regulation and does not depend on a delegated act.
That last line matters. Micro brands are exempt from the destruction ban. But your wholesale buyers, the boutiques and concept stores you want to stock your brand, are not. They will pass the data requirement down to their suppliers. That means you. A DPP-ready brand gets the shelf space. One that isn’t ready doesn’t.
We cover the full implications of the destruction ban in our guide to the EU ban on destroying unsold fashion goods.
The European Commission’s Working Plan identifies textiles and apparel as a priority area for DPP implementation (European Commission ESPR Working Plan, 2024). Based on current timelines, the realistic picture looks like this:
Smaller brands will receive extended transition periods for some obligations under Article 19 of ESPR, but not indefinite exemptions. The destruction ban already applies to micro and small enterprises on the same timeline as larger brands, which is a signal of how the Commission intends to frame DPP obligations.
The most immediate enforcement isn’t coming from Brussels. It’s coming from your buyers.
Retailers are already beginning to ask brands for supply chain data as a supplier condition, independently of what regulators require. Buyers and procurement teams at the premium and enterprise level will increasingly treat DPP readiness as a baseline expectation, not a differentiator. If you can’t send a link to your product data, you don’t make the shortlist.
The regulatory risk compounds this. Under ESPR, non-compliant products can be blocked from sale in the EU, and member states must establish “effective, proportionate, and dissuasive” penalties. Fines are expected to follow a model similar to GDPR enforcement. Exact per-country penalty frameworks for the textile delegated act have not yet been confirmed.
The Digital Product Passport is legally established under ESPR.
However, for textiles, footwear and accessories, concrete obligations will only arise once delegated acts are adopted, likely from 2027 onwards, with implementation no earlier than 2028.
In the meantime, the brands that will find DPP compliance straightforward are those that already know their supply chains, document their materials, and consider product longevity as a design parameter.
11 May 2026
3 April 2026
26 March 2026