Tretorn’s commitment to ethical practices is affirmed by its membership in Amfori, ensuring ethical workplace standards across its supply chain. While specific production locations remain undisclosed, the sourcing of some raw materials from Taiwan has been noted. Notably, Tretorn demonstrates a strong social commitment by donating all proceeds from a particular collection to the Sea Life Trust, supporting marine conservation efforts.
However, further details on the exact sourcing and production practices are needed to fully assess their sustainability efforts.
Tretorn’s use of materials, based on a sample set of product descriptions, showcases a commitment to diverse environmental practices, though the overall material percentages remain unclear, limiting a full assessment of the brand’s materiality. They utilize:
Recycled Materials: OCEAN-SHELL® fabric from recycled PET bottles, Econyl® from ocean waste, and REPREVE® recycled polyester.
Natural and Degradable Materials: FSC certified rubber and PLA from plants in their degradable Bio Plant Jacket.
Cotton Varieties: Both organic and conventional cotton are present in their products.
Innovative Non-Toxic Materials: Such as neoprene laminated with nylon or polyester, synthetic fur, and polyester items with non-toxic PU, PFC, and PVC free coatings.
Eco-Leather and Suede: Utilised in footwear, aiming to reduce water use and regulate dye processes.
Note: The certifications for FSC and GRS are unverified, and further information is required to validate these claims. The precise percentages of materials used are not detailed, which impacts the transparency of their sustainability reporting. They also are unclear about overall chemical usage within the brand.
Tretorn employs many circular practices by using leftover and recycled materials. However, their approach to circularity is tempered by the prevalence of material blends in their products, which complicates the recycling process. Additionally, while some items are claimed to be degradable, enhancing their circular potential, more specifics about these claims are needed to fully assess their validity. The use of Global Recycling Standard (GRS) certified materials in some products further indicates a move towards circularity, though these certifications are not yet verified, which leaves room for further confirmation of their sustainability practices.
Tretorn is headquartered in Sweden, with some raw materials reportedly sourced from Taiwan, suggesting a long supply chain. However, details on transportation methods and the full extent of the supply chain locations are not provided, leaving us without a clear picture of the emissions potentially produced during the transportation of their products.
Some products by Tretorn are PETA certified vegan, however it is unclear if this applies to the entire brand.
Tretorn celebrates over a century of heritage, underscoring its commitment to timeless design and high-quality products that withstand Scandinavian weather and the rigours of active, outdoor lifestyles. Their dedication to practical and stylish products is evident in their wide-ranging offerings, from pioneering sneakers to durable rubber boots and outerwear. Tretorn provides detailed care guides for both clothing and footwear, ensuring that each item maintains its integrity and style through proper maintenance.
Tretorn offers a broad narrative on their innovative materials and sustainable activities, yet lacks concrete, verifiable details that fully elucidate their production and sourcing practices. There’s an absence of specific information about the locations of production and sourcing, as well as the chemicals used in manufacturing. Additionally, details regarding transportation methods and packaging strategies are not disclosed.
Zaključak
Tretorn demonstrates commitment towards sustainability, but their transparency remains inadequate for a comprehensive evaluation by COSH!. Crucial details regarding their production processes, material sourcing, and environmental impact are not sufficiently disclosed, hindering a thorough assessment of their sustainability claims. A more transparent approach is essential to validate their efforts and align with best practices in sustainable production.
